🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and parents are monitoring closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Movement

In Europe, a rising number of countries are moving toward similar restrictions.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the PM arguing that phones and platforms are "robbing our youngsters' youth". Legislation could be formalized soon.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Authorities have indicated that an Australia-style ban remains "one of the options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked lawmakers to pass a proposal increasing the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a related move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has recommended guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has approved a advisory resolution calling for a ban for minors without guardian approval is granted. Although it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these platforms, the step does not establish binding law.

"An effective age restriction is a solid first step," said a leading parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is off the table" but insisting any policy must be "supported by robust research".

Previously, interest built behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. One foundation set up by the family of a teenager who was lost after viewing disturbing platform posts argues that a simple age ban could fail to protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when users turn 16.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the social media companies to create products and services that are safe and suitable for minors," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, action is largely occurring at the regional level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further use needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly introduced laws demanding guardian approval for teenagers to create social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and suggestions from various politicians to copy Australia's path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Views

Outside of Europe and the US, additional states are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to ban social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, world bodies take a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The body notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide discussion unfolds, the policies of Australia and its followers show that policymakers globally are no longer willing to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.